With Reuben Goossens

Cruise’n’Travel Journalist / Cruise Reviewer

& Maritime Historian

 

Updated September 2011

 

Please Note: Cruise-Australia is a non-commercial and privately owned cruise site and it is NOT associated with any cruise company or travel agency! Although the author has been in the passenger shipping industry since 1960 and is currently semi-retired, but continues to write cruise and ship reviews and articles in order to better to inform cruise and ship enthusiasts and provide information for those intending a cruise in the future. Please read my statement at the bottom of the page!

 

 

MV Athena is one of my favourite ships, she has a rich and a reliable history as the ex Trans-Atlantic liner MS Stockholm

She was completely rebuilt in Italy in 1994 to become a modern luxury cruise ship, with Superb Interiors, offering fine food, service and spacious accommodations!

She is operated by Classic International Cruises in Australia each summer season and the author sailed from Fremantle to the UK in 2011 and I loved it so

much that I will go again in April 2012, sailing via South Africa this time. lLike the last voyage I hope to give two maritime lectures during the cruise if asked.

This page is all about your questions about ships and cruising, thus you are welcome to write and ask me. Some of these questions, if they are of interest to the general cruising community will be shown on this page, but names will be withheld, unless you ask me specifically to include it!

**********************************

Question … “Dear Reuben. Some time ago you had an article online regarding the constant use by cruise companies of the word “liners.” Is it possible for you to place it online again?

Peter Stevens.”

Answer … “Thank you Peter, there have been a number of emails requesting for me to return this item online and thus I decided to add it to this page in its original form.”

What is it about the use of the word … “Superliners”

Cruise industry executives and their use of the word - *“Superliners.” - See the Sea Princess Mews Update below.

For heaven’s sake why do people like Princess Cruises President Mr. Alan Buckelew, Carnival CEO Ms Ann Sherry, and all executives from various Cruise Companies in the modern age make the very same mistake and continue to make stupid statements about then having “Superliners.”

Has no one ever told you, and I am well aware that most of you have originally come out of the world of banking, hotel, marketing and accounting rather than the shipping industry, that there is not a single “liner” in your fleet? Let me give you some big news - All your ships may well be Grand and luxurious Cruise Ships but they are certainly not “Superliners.”

A “liner” is classified as being a ship that sails on a “line voyage,” that means sailing from point to point, such as return sailings from Southampton to the USA, or Canada, South Africa, South America, and New Zealand and Australia as it was in days gone by. Ships such as the original RMS (Royal Mail Ship) Queen may, RMS Queen Elizabeth, SS Himalaya, Fairsky, Australis, Galileo, Southern Cross, Flavia, Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, Waterman (HAL) being the ships of Cunard, P&O, Orient, Sitmar, Chandris, Lloyd Triestino, Shaw Savill, Cogedar, Royal Dutch Mails and Holland America Lines. These ships had prefixes such as RMS, TSS, RHMS, SS or MS and they were the classic liners of yesteryear but they have now long gone, except for Hotel Queen Mary in Long Beach Ca USA. See three dictionary quotations at the bottom, including one from Encyclopedia Britannica.

However, shipping has had a massive revival in the guise of cruising and that is to be applauded therefore today our oceans are filled with some of the finest and grandest cruise ships imaginable!

I again state to the executives of all cruise companies that ALL your ships are “cruise ships,” and that includes cruise ships such as the so-called “liner” Queen Mary 2 that makes the seasonal Trans Atlantic crossings, but she remains a cruise ship and not a Liner. I fact even one of her captains totally agreed with me when I spoke with him late in 2009! Thus when will these land based executives and marketing team learn? Or is it too hard for them to come up with something new that sounds as big and grand?

I have been in the passenger shipping industry since May 1960 and co-owned a cruise company, in addition I have been a maritime historian for the past 33 years, thus I should know what I am talking about. Some will tell me that words have taken on a new meaning, well I am sorry - “gay” used to mean “happy,” but “Liner” still means a “ship, or large vessel on a line voyage.”

Check your current 2009/2010 dictionary! Where it states that a “Liner is …”

1… “One of the two principal types of merchant ship as classified by operating method; the other is the tramp steamer. A liner operates on a REGULAR SCHEDULE OF DESIGNATED PORTS, carrying whatever cargo and passengers are available on the date of sailing. The first liners were operated in the North Atlantic, notably by Samuel Cunard of Britain, beginning in 1840. Cunard liners continued to be leaders, though soon joined by French, German, U.S., and other ships, subsidized by their national governments and competing in size, speed, and passenger accommodations.” (Encyclopedia Britannica).

2… “A vessel belonging to a REGULAR LINE (service).” (Webster’s).

3… “A large commercial ship or airplane, especially one carrying passengers on a REGULAR ROUTE.” (thefreeDictionary).

Get the picture? You have been told before but executives tend to … but they are very good at many things and obviously, thanks to a good marketing campaign, bookings prove that things are going well. But is it not time you learned and dump the word “Superliner”?

Although whenever shipping companies have their marketing and media agencies send me their news updates, I always remove their “superliner” statements as I find this to be the statement of an unlearned person, who does not know the industry, and frankly they don’t, they are all hoteliers and that’s about it! Thank God for the sailors on board, and I mean captains and officers, at least they know the difference and they have a good laugh at the expense of their bosses!

“When a Liner is NOT a Liner!”

NEW … September 12, 2011: I was sent the following item, which was written by a well known ex merchant seaman Mr. Alistair Macnab and well known personality living in the USA. He served from being a Third Mate on the Bank Line passenger cargo liner SS Inchanga to becoming the President of the Greater Houston Port Bureau in Houston Texas. Thus he has gained great respect within the industry and has a vast knowledge of the industry and shipping in general! Alistair retired in 2007.

The following are Alistair’s thoughts on the question “Can a Cruise Ship also be called a Liner?”

“I believe this topic has been discussed quite often but since it has come up again, I’ll give you my take on the topic.

The word ‘liner’ denotes a ship assigned to a regular, advertised sailing on a given route that is open as a common carrier to accept cargo and passengers for any of the ports being advertised. Note that a liner may be a cargo-only ship and the term does not only exist for passenger ships.

In the days before airlines were the only way to go, it was the regularly advertised schedules of the passenger ship companies that were the only way of getting to where you were going. In that sense, these ships were liners.

Cruise ships, on the other hand, are out and back with the same passengers on board and whilst they are well advertised, they are not liners in the strict definition of the word but merely voyages of opportunity much like the original definition of a ‘tramp’ ship.

Certainly, the term ‘luxury liner’ is the biggest misnomer of all but is the regularly employed description of a ship carrying passengers used by the Press.

By the way, a ‘tramp’ ship is somewhat of a pejorative word used for a cargo-only ship when the better description would be a ‘freighter’ or a ‘cargo ship.’ A cargo ship will be a liner when it is assigned to a regular, advertised sailing by its operator and a tramp ship will be open for hire or charter to a merchant who will take the entire ship (or sometimes part of it) for his own cargo, quite often a homogeneous bulk commodity but could just as easily be a full load of containers or general cargo.

When the “Queen Mary 2” operates on the UK/USA service, she could be on a “line voyage,” but when cruising, then she is just a “cruise ship,” not a “cruise liner or “luxury liner.” It’s not the luxury that's in question but the erroneous use of the word ‘liner’.”

As you can tell Alistair Macnab agrees with me completely with what I have stated online over the years, but those ignorant modern and so called cruise executives who prove themselves to be utter fools over and over again as they make sure that their media use the words “luxury liner” or Megaliner: Superliner,” etc. For there is not a liner to be found amongst any of these modern cruise ships, for that is just what they are “Cruise Ships.”

Question … “Dear Reuben. This year I decided to buy a Berlitz complete guide to Cruising, the 2010 edition and I am wondering how accurate it is, for some of the observations seems to be very much related to the higher rated ships and accommodations. Now I have sailed on some of the ships that they seem to, well to put it mildly, put down in certain ways; be it slamming their food or other facets. What is your opinion of this guide?”

Answer … “Dear Janet. Thank you for your question and I have seen this year’s addition as I did recently obtain one not having do so since, would you believe it since 1999. However, there are a number of points that we need to keep in mind regarding a book of this nature and that is although we call it the “Berlitz Guide,” etc, it is in reality the “Douglas Ward guide to Cruising.”

Now I have met this man, by mere change whilst I was on a cruise, and the crew were all out to please him as was the captain and officers, for they are all afraid of what he might say, and I was told that he was the most difficult person you could possibly imagine! Now I can certainly not verify this, but that was the statement of the Hotel and Passenger Service Manager onboard. However, it is said that certain companies can do no wrong, no matter what and that alone does beg a question?

When it comes to the current edition of the guide, I noted that it is full of errors and considering it has 201 on the cover, you would expect that it is up to date, but believe me that it is far from the truth. Douglas Ward allows details to go out that are far out of date and even when companies have spent millions on changing their product and have upgraded their catering to a much higher level, but no, the “Almighty Douglas Ward condemns for example the food that P&O Cruises serve their passengers, stating that the food on the Pacific Dawn is poor and that it tastes bland, fish is poor and that it is disguised by crumbs or batter, and although the meat is generous it is covered in heavy sauces, etc. Now, I have dined on this ship, as has personal friends of mine, and I have reviews online, and we all rave about the superb cuisine that is served in the Palm Court Restaurant. In addition, this so-called cruise expert states that the deserts “are just so-so.” He then continues to state that afternoon tea is poor, etc. Then when describing the Pacific Sun he describes how the ship has a “twisting, two deck high controlled that empties you in it” (the pool). Mr. Ward, wake up, the ship was refurbished in Brisbane in 2008 and that hideous American Carnival waterslide was thankfully removed providing extra deck space! In addition, the cover shows the ex Louis Cruise ship MV Serenade, which has long been sold to the breakers and she was beached at Alang India in November 2006, where she was duly broken up by mid 2007. Yet the 2010 Berlitz Cruising Guide has her as their front cover featured ship. Madness!

In addition, we need to understand that Mr. Ward is the kind of person that only demands the best and don’t the crew of every ship he ever visit’s know about that! But, what I mean to say is this, he does not think like most passengers who want to go on a vacation, Mr Ward is Mr. is in reality Mr5 Star, or Mr super luxury, whilst most passengers desire a good ship with good accommodations, service, food, entertainment, and ports, and I can tell you that a budget ship can give you all that although in the book he makes terrible statements about ships I know well and ships that I would gladly sail on! In addition these are ships that I have countless rave reviews from past passengers from, yet, he slams these ships cuisine, service and facilities, proving that he does not in reality understand cruising as he claims, regardless of all his grandeous claims, they mean nothing! Star ratings do not always matter, for I have been on a 2 Star ship and it was simply wonderful, great value for money, OK, the variety of food in the dinning room may not have been as vast as on some other ships, but it was of a high quality and most enjoyable!

Janet, I suggest that you take Douglas Ward’s ship guide with a grain of salt, for it is only a guide, and not a good one at that! However the first 176 pages do contain some and interesting reasonable good material!

Personally, I write for the passenger, and that is the big difference for I write on our, the passengers level, for I will only write a review if I have fully paid for my own cruise and not on a freebie like Mr Ward! Thus, I am quite unlike him who writes from high up, just like most travel writers who sail as a guest. Now that does not make me popular with some cruise companies for they know I always tell the truth, the good and the average and, yes even the bad if it is worth mentioning. For instance I used to love Princess Cruises and I am an Elite Member having the famed black card when I cruise with them and receive all those extras on board. However, after our disastrous 2009 106 night Sydney to Sydney and then Sydney to Brisbane around the World Cruise on the Dawn Princess, I wrote the facts in my review online and the cruise was not too great due to arriving in a filthy cabin that had to be completely washed down and carpets steam cleaned, the shower recess was blocked, air-conditioning did not work correctly for the duration of the cruise, water leakages throughout the ship, mechanical breakdowns and the cruise director from hell who has since been banned forever and will never serve in Australia again thanks to my intervention. However, I also have a wonderful 2001 Princess Cruises review of the wonderful Pacific Princess, which I sailed on many times, and it is so sad that she has gone, now she had class and only 600 passengers! Princess was a great company, but I feel that P&O Cruises UK is by far a superior product to a World Cruise as their ships are designed for such voyages, especially their cabins, which are much superior to the Dawn Princess, which are pathetic, not having sofa’s, tea and coffee making facilities, which every cabin on P&O UK has as well as many other features, including ample wardrobes, another item missing on the Dawn princess in many cabins for a 106 night voyage!

What about P&O Cruises Australia I hear you ask? I fully support P&O, for they have done so much for these ships and upgraded every department, their menus and wine lists are indeed second to none, and now there is the optional and well worth it Luke Mangan’s “Salt Grill” on Board three of their ships, the Pacific Dawn, Jewel and soon the Pearl. Now a visit to this restaurant is a MUST, but please book early for it does get booked out! P&O’s entertainment is outstanding, but above all, the service is genuinely friendly and efficient and then there is the superb youth and children’s facilities, which are divided into three separate age groups, and these are the best you could possibly wish for. Just read the reviews that I have online regarding this! And you will find none of this in the Ward’s 2010 Berlitz Cruise Guide!

As you can well imagine I receive countless email with questions regarding cruise ships and companies, including this one, which only came up again last week;

Question … “Dear Reuben. Are there any cruise companies you would not sail with and if so why not?”

Over the years I have received quite a few questions that are similar, but possibly not quite so direct. Personally I have sailed with many cruise lines over the years and I certainly do not rate each ship. Or company according to the Star ratings that are given by some of those pompous cruise reviewers who go on their free cruises and rate and review countless ships and write their little expensive books and make a name for them selves as well as a small fortune.

Personally, having been in the passenger shipping industry since 1960, managed major passenger shipping companies and operated my own cruise company and sold the name to a major player, a company that continues to operate, I do this on a 100% non-commercial basis. In addition, the only reason I have this site is online is because I love this industry dearly and hope to see people who love travelling by ship go on a cruise and come home totally delighted. To date I have been some 124 times since 1958! Oops, am I showing my age now?

However, there are certainly some cruise lines that I would avoid! This is either because of direct experience and others due to the countless of complaints I have received in my inbox over the years, and they have become far too many too ignore. Having said this, I also wish to add that I do receive certain complaints that I simply delete mostly because these are from persons whom I call “professional complainers” and they are miserable people that complain regarding everything, no matter what! Thus, these I do not count these, for I have been around long enough to know the difference.

Now for the two companies that I consider at this time to be at the top of the list, and I have added a third, however, this company does have its good points, but it also has many problems, especially those ships operating out of Australia such as the 104 night around the world voyage and grand Pacific circle voyage. Details are below.

1… NCL Cruises … The top of the list as being the world’s WORST cruise company!

This is the first cruise line to be avoided … NCL Cruises. But let’s look back at its background. This cruise company was once a superb cruise company owned by a wonderful man, Mr. Knut Klosters whose father Lauritz Klosters who commenced a family based shipping company “Klosters Rederi” back in 1902. Knut’s first cruise ship was the popular 8,600-ton MV Sunward which soon headed for Miami and she was a great success. Other ships followed and in 1969 the company was renamed Norwegian Caribbean Lines or as we mostly know it today, NCL. Then in 1979 the greatest of all ships at the time joined the fleet, the SS France, which after an extensive refit was renamed SS Norway and she became the companies flagship. Many thought it madness to use a ship of her size, but she was a massive hit and remained a popular ship until the very end!

However, great changes took place to this superbly run company in 2000 when the Asian, Malaysian based Casino giant - Genting Corp” who were the owners of Star Cruises, who operated mostly short cruises, but these were based on the on board massive casino, Star Cruises took over NCL and immediately commenced changing the superb traditions of cruising that this company had become so famous for into what the Asians called “Freestyle Cruising,” which in reality means, getting as much money as possible out of their passengers wallets by the end of the voyage! Sadly the company went down hill ever since and I have received thousands of emails not only from passengers, but also crew, from officers, engineers and general staff and their stories are not fit to print. But personally although the ships crew do work very hard indeed they do so under great stress, and they try everything to get off their ship and the company to another cruise company! Of course many know of the great disaster when one of SS Norway’s boilers blew up and there were deaths and injuries of a good number of crew, and NCL was charged with negligence. There is a long story attached to the tragedy of the Norway and how she ended up on the beach in India to be broken up, considering that NCL’s CEO had stated that she would go to Germany to be repaired and return to service, but we all knew that was NOT the truth, for the Sra Cruises management had already decided otherwise. But that is another long story! NCL, purchased the SS United States and the SS Independence, two great historic liners and advised the US Government, that if the government would give permission for NCL to have an American flagged company, they would restore the SS United States and the SS Independence and return these two famous ships to service. They were given permission and NCL America was born, however these two ships were left to rot and rust away. They sacredly sold the Independence to an in-house company, who renamed her and sold her to an Indian, and the long and short of it is she is now a wreck along the coast of Alang. The great SS United States has been taken over by a preservation society, for NCL was goi g to sell her for scrap, for instead of doing what they had promised, they built three brand new ships, where in Germany. An all American company that was supposed to have American ships and crew ended up with three German ships and one ship for Star Cruises, also built in Germany! However, the things on board was not very happy and the crew had a very low morale as they were treated poorly by the company. Passengers certainly did npot get what they paid for!

A passenger wrote several weeks ago:

“The cruise was not what I expected, we have been on many cruises, but this was very different. The staff seemed to be uptight all the time, but very courteous and helpful, I have no complaints re them, but felt sorry for them. My cabin steward told me some things and they have it very hard, but what I could not tolerate was that the crew onboard are not fed properly and from what I gathered there even seems to be some kind of harassment. The ship inside was really very nice, although was beginning to look tired. Also we got sick and tired of the constant heavy sell on the ship, and the shifty way of doing things when it come to the dinning arrangements, for they will do anything for you to eat anywhere but in the dining room that you have already paid for in your fare. We found that there are long lines to get into the main dining room, thus many just walk away and end up paying extra in one of the alternative dining facilities. We just got angry! Even the Buffet it was a mad house and the food was not good. We did the Hawaiian cruise and the ports of call were wonderful, but do it on any other company, never with NCL again, it was my first and last!”

One of the most recent emails received was from a band member and this person wrote:

“We live under such duress and at times we almost live in fear, we work long hours and yet we go unappreciated and have constant problems with the Cruise Director who is a tyrant and works on self edification and making (himself/herself) look good to the company. We just get the raw deal and are sick of it. Thankfully three of us are off in three weeks and will never return to NCL and this nightmare!” (Altered).

2… MSC Cruises … An Italian Company, also with a good history, but NOW?

MSC Cruises came originally out of the great Flotta Lauro Lines, and many will remember ships such as the SS Roma, Sydney. These ships were well known for their migrant and tourist services from Italy and Europe to Australia. Then it was time for newer and more modern ships such as the MS Angelina Lauro, ex Dutch liner MS Oranje and the MS Achille Lauro, ex Dutch liner MS Willem Ruys. The two later ships sailed on around the world services and later on cruises. Later this company became known as Star Lauro, and eventually when passenger services had almost ceased it became Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), then when cruise services where recommenced, the word Cruises was added again, but at large the company is just known as MSC!

Currently they operate a considerable fleet of ships, all quite new and modern, but the main problem on all of their ships is one of severe over crowding for the size of their ships. As I am told so often by Australian’s who purchase rather inexpensive fly/cruise packages on these ships:

“The noise level in the Restaurant is beyond belief, and we came to a decision not to eat there any more, for it is unbearable.”

A Canadian passenger wrote:

“Never MSC again, what a disaster, food was only just edible, service reasonable, but the noise and the crowding that is impossible. The worst of all I found was the announcements for they came in so many languages that it went on and on and frankly it gave me a headache many times for you could not switch it off. It came in Italian, German, French, Spanish, Dutch, English and several other languages. Just madness! The ship itself was quite pleasant, however the cabins were not half as good compared to other cruise lines we have been on in the past. My suggestion is if you are going to cruise around Europe and the Mediterranean, go on a reliable company, one you can trust, I am an ardent Holland America Line passenger, which I believe is still the best! In addition I have sailed with the P&O Cruises as well as Fred Olsen Cruise Lines, both offering a excellent cruise vacation, but I took the stupid bait of a “good deal,” but it certainly was not!”

3… Princess Cruises (Australia) – A great company gone wrong in the wrong hands!

As many know, I am a Princess Cruises “Elite Club Member” black card holder, that is the very top level having cruised with Princess many times in the past and have always enjoyed the experience, especially the smaller R-Ships, such as the Pacific Princess! Why did Carnival Australia have to take the delightful Pacific Princess away, you money hungry … (well you know what I mean!). I believe there is a market in Australia for a superior market, for the larger ships, such as the Sun, Dawn and Sea Princess do not touch the R-Ships by far!

However, I have come to a point that I will not sail with Princess again, for the last time I sailed with them was when I undertook on the Dawn Princess’s 104 (106 nights back to Brisbane) around the world voyage in 2009, and sadly it was one of the worst cruise experiences I have ever had! The review is still online, although I have now edited somewhat. But from the moment I arrived at my filthy cabin that had to be steam cleaned before we could enter, no air-conditioning for weeks, leaking ceilings with water dripping every where, unbelievable! And there were countless other problems including major mechanical breakdowns. Sadly I find that Princess has gone down hill rapidly and that even P&O Cruises Australia is better than any Princess’ ship operating out of our waters, even though Princess ships are certainly far grandeur and look good, but it is all show, but there is no real substance, for on our voyage the food, and accommodations simply would not compare to the P&O ships. In fact in 2008 I sailed on the oldest P&O Australia ship the Pacific Sun, and although she may not be the glamour ship, however, the food was some of the best I have had on any ship for year to that date! The service was exemplary! Entertainment could not be faulted unlike on the Dawn Princess where we only saw five real shows in the Theatre from Sydney to Southampton, can you believe that? Before any of the Australian based princess ships I would sail on Pacific Dawn, Jewel, Pearl, even the Pacific Sun, which now has had a number of good refits!

I do not recommend the Sun or Dawn Princess for an extended voyage, OK they may be are reasonable for a week, possibly two weeks, but no more. Please remember they were designed and exclusively built to operate sailing the Caribbean for 7 night cruises, that is all, they were never meant to operate extended voyages, that was the idea of landlubbers who have never worked in shipping in their lives, CEO’s and managements who hail from Banking corporations, Accountants, Hotels, and their cabins were not designed for this!

You may ask – “Did you enjoy writing the above?” No I certainly did not, but I did so in order to best inform my readers

Question … “Dear Reuben. Whilst on a cruise on the (name of ship and company removed) I purchased a painting at the art auction and was told that it had a certain value and was given a valuation. However, when arriving home, and when the painting finally arrived home, which took well over seven months, I had the valuation checked just for interest and discovered that it was not even an original as I was led to believe and it was not even worth a third of what I had paid for it. Thus my question is how does the shipping company get away with this, for is this not misleading and sheer robbery?

Jason X.

Answer … “First of all we need to realise that the company you sailed with is operated by a company not owned by the Cruise operator and they are a concession who pay the carrier to be on board, like many of the shops, boutiques, photo shops and spa’s etc, for most are independently owned, although some shipping company’s are now entering these markets themselves.

The point is the minute you board the ship, you become a target for clever, be it somewhat deceptive marketing. And the tragedy is that these art auctions are the biggest rip-offs of them all, however the sheer greed of human nature tends to feed this kind of marketing. It all starts with the lure of an invitation of the so-called free champagne, which is never champagne just a cheap sparkling white wine that comes only towards the end of a long sales talk, and many by then will have gone anyway for only the suckers remain. (Sorry Jason I did not to insult you, but it is true). Sadly, the daily news and entertainment programs delivered to your room has become nothing short from a marketing tool, as most contain more pure sell, be it the boutiques, photo shop, the spa, optional dinning, art auctions and the list these days just keeps growing. For let’s face it Cruise companies these days are run by corporate accountants, and hoteliers and not old time shipping companies, the kind I was part of all my days, and I am thankful that I do not work in the cruise industry of today, for I like to hold my head up high, and I certainly could not, for passengers are being fleeced in every possible way. *Although there is one company that stands apart, more later!

What are the “art pieces” in the galleries and at these actions? Well not one of these will be heirlooms, for most are in reality litographs and seriographs, and thus without any real value! For those who cruise frequently will have come to realise that the very same pieces are on show an just about every ship they sail on, that must tell you something, thus BE WARNED! The appraisal prices are all done by the companies own art providers, thus do not be conned by the values the quote, they are totally meaningless! The marketers that are hired are highly trained to use clever language to make you feel you are obtaining something very special and, yes even a bargain. You wish? Beware of phrases such as “replacement value”, or a clever one, “signed in stone” now what does that really mean? That in reality means that the artist did not sign the work, or an item that is known as a “pochoire”, which is a stencil print which is of an even less value than an original etching or a lithograph. The auctioneer will even try to sell a “block print” or a “wood engraving” with an signature, whatever you do, do not buy it, for I have know people who discovered it was not genuine, including the signature! Sadly forged items are not uncommon!

You may ask, but what can I do about my purchase, frankly nothing, you bought iy because you liked it. Is the cruise company responsible? Technically no, they will not take any responsibility for sales in any of the shops, art gallery, etc, for they act only as the carrier, and remember the art house is only a concession!”

PS: *Thankfully there is one single company that is all inclusive of gratitude’s, all food on board, no optional dinning venues, decks or lounges, like on so many cruise companies and ships these days. This company has become very popular in Australia and around the world. Although it is classed as a budget cruise company, Classic International Cruises operate intimate ships, such as the superb MV Athena out of Fremantle and the MV Princess Daphne from Singapore and Hong Kong every Australian summer, for around 550 passengers. I receive countless rave reviews regarding this company and their superbly maintained European ships, for the excellent and friendly service, simply wonderful cuisine from early in the morning, right through to late night snacks or midnight buffets, and even morning teas, something gone on the new cruise companies. Classic International Cruises operated their ships on the old style European principles, and these are ships first, offering the ultimate in comfort, Athena has spacious cabins and every cabin has a full sized bath and shower, try and find that on a modern ship?

 

Return to the - Cruise-Australia.com - INDEX

Who is the Author of Cruise-Australia & ssMaritime?

Commenced in the Passenger Shipping Industry in May 1960

 

Contact the Author …

When sending an email please name the ship or company you are commenting on!

 

Please Note: Cruise-Australia is a non-commercial and privately owned cruise site. The author has been in the passenger shipping industry since 1960 and is currently semi-retired, but continues to write cruise and ship reviews and articles in order to better to inform cruise and ship enthusiasts and provide information for those intending a cruise in the future.

 

However, if you are interested in a cruise, I am happy to refer you to a dedicated cruise agent in Australia, New Zealand or further afield on my recommended “cruise agents” page, for these are agents that specialise in cruising and they will be able offer excellent service you and the best fares available! Be assured, I do NOT receive any commissions or favours from these agents, and in the vast majority of cases these agents will not even be aware of my, or mu site’s involvement, as I provide the enquirer with the requested information of the agents (in their region) including their contact details. Reuben Goossens. 

 

 

Cruise-Australia.com

& Cruise-Australia.net  

 

Classic Liner enthusiasts visit

ssMaritime.com & ssMaritime.net

Where the ships of the past make history the 1914 built MV Doulos Story

 

Visit our Classic Ocean Voyages Campaign Feature 

 

Photographs on cruise-australia.net are: 1. By the author. 2. From the author’s private collection. 3. As provided by Shipping Companies and private photographers or collectors. Credit is given to all contributors. However, there are photographs provided to me without details provided regarding the photographer concerned. I hereby invite if owners of these images would be so kind to make them-selves known to me, that due credit may be given. I know what it is like, I have seen a multitude of my own photographs on other sites, yet they either refuse to give me credit and even refuse to remove them, knowing full well that there is no legal comeback when it comes to the net. However, let us show the charlatans up and do the right thing at all times and give credit where credit is due! Note: I do not credit those who send me photos as they are not the owners of the photographs concerned, unless the image is part of their private collection.

This notice covers all pages, although, I have done my best to ensure that all photographs are duly credited and that this notice is displaced on each page, that is, when a page is updated!

 

 Dear Reuben

 

cruise-australia.net is owned and © Copyright by Reuben Goossens - All Rights Reserved

 

Free Counter
Free Counter